Of you are simply curious, looking for advice, or have a question, we are ready to think along with you. Feel free to reach out.
All articles
Self Insight and Leadership, the neurobiological foundation of decision making under pressure
Introduction
Effective leadership is often associated with vision, decisiveness and strategic choices. Recent insights from neuroscience, however, show that self insight, the ability to reflect on one’s own emotions, thought processes and behaviour, is a crucial predictor of leadership success (Goleman, 2013). This ability becomes especially decisive under conditions of high pressure. Neurobiological research demonstrates that stress influences decision making by disrupting the balance between the prefrontal cortex and the limbic system (Arnsten, 2009). Understanding these mechanisms enables leaders to make more effective choices, even in crisis situations.
The brain under pressure
Decision making under time pressure primarily activates the amygdala, the brain’s alarm system. This leads to fast, emotionally driven responses, often at the expense of rational reasoning (LeDoux, 2000). Under acute stress, cortisol release increases, which inhibits activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the area responsible for executive functions such as planning, inhibition and scenario evaluation (Arnsten, 2009).
A study by Porcelli and Delgado (2009) showed that participants under stress were significantly more likely to choose safe, short term options over rationally superior long term strategies. This confirms that stress reduces cognitive flexibility and increases the likelihood of tunnel vision. For leaders in organisations, this can result in risk averse behaviour, defensive decision making and a loss of innovative capacity.
The role of self insight
Self insight acts as a buffer against these stress responses. Leaders who recognise their own physiological and emotional reactions can apply interventions that reactivate the prefrontal cortex. Research on mindfulness and leadership shows that eight weeks of mindfulness training increases grey matter density in the prefrontal cortex and strengthens connectivity with the amygdala (Hölzel et al., 2011). This leads to improved emotion regulation and decision making.
In addition, research by Boyatzis and McKee (2005) demonstrates that empathic and self aware leaders score significantly higher on employee satisfaction and team performance. Data show that organisations led by leaders with high emotional intelligence achieve up to 20 percent better performance compared to similar organisations led by leaders scoring low on this dimension (Cherniss, 2010).
Self insight as the foundation of leadership
Self insight not only enhances the effectiveness of individual decisions, but also creates a culture of psychological safety (Edmondson, 1999). Leaders who acknowledge their own limitations encourage openness within teams and lower the threshold for employees to share mistakes or doubts. This mechanism strengthens collective intelligence and leads to more innovative and robust decision making (Woolley et al., 2010).
Conclusion
Leadership without self insight remains vulnerable to the disruptive effects of stress. Neuroscientific evidence underscores that self reflection and emotion regulation are not “soft skills”, but neurobiologically grounded competencies that directly influence decision making quality. Investing in self insight through training, reflection and feedback enhances both the personal resilience of leaders and the adaptive capacity of organisations.
References
Arnsten, A. F. T. (2009). Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 410–422.
Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2005). Resonant leadership: Renewing yourself and connecting with others through mindfulness, hope, and compassion. Harvard Business Press.
Cherniss, C. (2010). Emotional intelligence: Toward clarification of a concept. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3(2), 110–126.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
Goleman, D. (2013). Focus: The hidden driver of excellence. HarperCollins.
Hölzel, B. K., et al. (2011). Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 191(1), 36–43.
LeDoux, J. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23(1), 155–184.
Porcelli, A. J., & Delgado, M. R. (2009). Acute stress modulates risk taking in financial decision making. Psychological Science, 20(3), 278–283.
Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004), 686–688.
Effective leadership is often associated with vision, decisiveness and strategic choices. Recent insights from neuroscience, however, show that self insight, the ability to reflect on one’s own emotions, thought processes and behaviour, is a crucial predictor of leadership success (Goleman, 2013). This ability becomes especially decisive under conditions of high pressure. Neurobiological research demonstrates that stress influences decision making by disrupting the balance between the prefrontal cortex and the limbic system (Arnsten, 2009). Understanding these mechanisms enables leaders to make more effective choices, even in crisis situations.
The brain under pressure
Decision making under time pressure primarily activates the amygdala, the brain’s alarm system. This leads to fast, emotionally driven responses, often at the expense of rational reasoning (LeDoux, 2000). Under acute stress, cortisol release increases, which inhibits activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the area responsible for executive functions such as planning, inhibition and scenario evaluation (Arnsten, 2009).
A study by Porcelli and Delgado (2009) showed that participants under stress were significantly more likely to choose safe, short term options over rationally superior long term strategies. This confirms that stress reduces cognitive flexibility and increases the likelihood of tunnel vision. For leaders in organisations, this can result in risk averse behaviour, defensive decision making and a loss of innovative capacity.
The role of self insight
Self insight acts as a buffer against these stress responses. Leaders who recognise their own physiological and emotional reactions can apply interventions that reactivate the prefrontal cortex. Research on mindfulness and leadership shows that eight weeks of mindfulness training increases grey matter density in the prefrontal cortex and strengthens connectivity with the amygdala (Hölzel et al., 2011). This leads to improved emotion regulation and decision making.
In addition, research by Boyatzis and McKee (2005) demonstrates that empathic and self aware leaders score significantly higher on employee satisfaction and team performance. Data show that organisations led by leaders with high emotional intelligence achieve up to 20 percent better performance compared to similar organisations led by leaders scoring low on this dimension (Cherniss, 2010).
Self insight as the foundation of leadership
Self insight not only enhances the effectiveness of individual decisions, but also creates a culture of psychological safety (Edmondson, 1999). Leaders who acknowledge their own limitations encourage openness within teams and lower the threshold for employees to share mistakes or doubts. This mechanism strengthens collective intelligence and leads to more innovative and robust decision making (Woolley et al., 2010).
Conclusion
Leadership without self insight remains vulnerable to the disruptive effects of stress. Neuroscientific evidence underscores that self reflection and emotion regulation are not “soft skills”, but neurobiologically grounded competencies that directly influence decision making quality. Investing in self insight through training, reflection and feedback enhances both the personal resilience of leaders and the adaptive capacity of organisations.
References
Arnsten, A. F. T. (2009). Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 410–422.
Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2005). Resonant leadership: Renewing yourself and connecting with others through mindfulness, hope, and compassion. Harvard Business Press.
Cherniss, C. (2010). Emotional intelligence: Toward clarification of a concept. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3(2), 110–126.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
Goleman, D. (2013). Focus: The hidden driver of excellence. HarperCollins.
Hölzel, B. K., et al. (2011). Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 191(1), 36–43.
LeDoux, J. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23(1), 155–184.
Porcelli, A. J., & Delgado, M. R. (2009). Acute stress modulates risk taking in financial decision making. Psychological Science, 20(3), 278–283.
Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004), 686–688.
Ook het beste uit je team halen?
Ontdek onze programma'sNieuws & updates
Waarom we soms kogels vangen voor elkaar – en wat dat ons kan leren op de werkvloer
8 October 2025
Zelfinzicht en Leiderschap: De Neurobiologische Grondslag van Besluitvorming onder Druk
8 October 2025
Situational Awareness: het onzichtbare wapen dat vaak vergeten wordt
8 October 2025
Unity zonder conformiteit: tegenspraak organiseren begint bij jezelf
8 October 2025
Van eilandjes naar eenheid: waarom teams meer nodig hebben dan samenwerking op papier
28 August 2025
Stappenakker 10